50 Games like Call of Duty (2003) that you should try

Of everything here, this is the nearest thing to Call of Duty (2003) — the two agree on genre, combat and game mode. The common ground extends to historical setting and single-player focus.

It shares the essentials of what Call of Duty (2003) does: strong narrative focus, melee combat and historical setting. Both also lean on a first-person view and multiplayer gameplay. What it adds of its own: PvP competition.

If Call of Duty (2003) worked for you because of strong narrative focus, melee combat and historical setting, the same is here. The common ground extends to single-player focus and a first-person view. Where the two diverge is setting: a sci-fi setting.

On paper it is what Call of Duty (2003) is — strong narrative focus, ranged combat and historical setting — though the resemblance is mostly at that level. The common ground extends to single-player focus and a first-person view. Where the two diverge is tone and setting: dark, oppressive atmosphere and horror setting.

It shares the essentials of what Call of Duty (2003) does: strong narrative focus, tactical combat and historical setting. The common ground extends to single-player focus and a first-person view. Where the two diverge is tone: dark, oppressive atmosphere.

Genre puts it alongside Call of Duty (2003), and so does strong narrative focus, melee combat and historical setting. Both also lean on multiplayer gameplay and a first-person view. The distance is in tone and setting — its own ground is dark, oppressive atmosphere and horror setting.

What brings it close to Call of Duty (2003) is strong narrative focus, ranged combat and single-player focus, and the two track each other on genre, combat and game mode. Both also lean on a first-person view. The distance is in setting and tone — its own ground is dark, oppressive atmosphere and a sci-fi setting.

It shares the essentials of what Call of Duty (2003) does: strong narrative focus, linear, story-driven structure and melee combat. To that it adds historical setting and single-player focus. They part company on game mode and combat: this one brings stealth mechanics and co-op play.

What brings it close to Call of Duty (2003) is melee combat, historical setting and single-player focus, and the two track each other on genre, game mode and setting. Both also lean on a first-person view. What it adds of its own: deep simulation.

It shares the essentials of what Call of Duty (2003) does: strong narrative focus, melee combat and historical setting. Both also lean on a first-person view and single-player focus. The distance is in tone and setting — its own ground is dark, oppressive atmosphere and horror setting.

With Call of Duty (2003) it shares melee combat, historical setting and single-player focus. To that it adds a first-person view. Its own ground is deep simulation and stealth mechanics.

If Call of Duty (2003) worked for you because of strong narrative focus, ranged combat and historical setting, the same is here. Both also lean on multiplayer gameplay and a first-person view. The distance is in game mode and setting — its own ground is a contemporary setting and online features.

If Call of Duty (2003) worked for you because of melee combat, historical setting and single-player focus, the same is here. To that it adds a first-person view.

With Call of Duty (2003) it shares strong narrative focus, tactical combat and historical setting. The common ground extends to multiplayer gameplay and a first-person view. Where the two diverge is visuals: a third-person camera.

If Call of Duty (2003) worked for you because of tactical combat, historical setting and single-player focus, the same is here. The common ground extends to a first-person view. Where they diverge is combat.