50 Games like Call of Duty: World at War that you should try

Held in common with Call of Duty: World at War: dark, oppressive atmosphere, melee combat and horror setting. To that it adds multiplayer gameplay and a first-person view. Its own ground is strong narrative focus and a sci-fi setting.

Matches like this one are rare: it meets Call of Duty: World at War on genre, combat and tone. Both also lean on loot and gear systems, and a first-person view.

Held in common with Call of Duty: World at War: dark, oppressive atmosphere, melee combat and single-player focus. To that it adds a first-person view. They part company on setting: this one brings a sci-fi setting.

It shares the essentials of what Call of Duty: World at War does: dark, oppressive atmosphere, melee combat and horror setting. The common ground extends to single-player focus and a first-person view. It sets itself apart with strong narrative focus and ranged combat.

If Call of Duty: World at War worked for you because of dark, oppressive atmosphere, tactical combat and horror setting, the same is here. To that it adds loot and gear systems, and multiplayer gameplay. They part company on combat: this one brings fantasy world.

It meets Call of Duty: World at War on dark, oppressive atmosphere, melee combat and historical setting. The common ground extends to single-player focus and a first-person view. Where the two diverge is game mode: strong narrative focus and a sci-fi setting.

What brings it close to Call of Duty: World at War is tactical combat, single-player focus and skill tree progression, and the two track each other on genre, game mode and progression. Both also lean on a first-person view. What it adds of its own: ranged combat and a third-person camera.

If Call of Duty: World at War worked for you because of dark, oppressive atmosphere, tactical combat and horror setting, the same is here. The common ground extends to multiplayer gameplay and a first-person view. Where the two diverge is setting: fantasy world.

The genre is the same as Call of Duty: World at War’s, and with it dark, oppressive atmosphere, melee combat and offline play. The common ground extends to a first-person view. Where the two diverge is setting and combat: magic-based combat and a sci-fi setting.

The genre is the same as Call of Duty: World at War’s, and with it melee combat, historical setting and single-player focus. Both also lean on a first-person view. The distance is in tone and setting — its own ground is a casual, approachable feel.

It meets Call of Duty: World at War on dark, oppressive atmosphere, melee combat and horror setting. The common ground extends to multiplayer gameplay and a first-person view. Where the two diverge is setting: a space setting.

With Call of Duty: World at War it shares melee combat, historical setting and multiplayer gameplay. Both also lean on a first-person view. The distance is in setting — its own ground is a sci-fi setting.

It shares the essentials of what Call of Duty: World at War does: dark, oppressive atmosphere, melee combat and horror setting. Both also lean on offline play and a first-person view. The distance is in combat — its own ground is ranged combat.

What brings it close to Call of Duty: World at War is melee combat, historical setting and single-player focus, and the two track each other on genre, combat and visuals. To that it adds a first-person view. They part company on tone and setting: this one brings strong narrative focus.

If Call of Duty: World at War worked for you because of dark, oppressive atmosphere, tactical combat and historical setting, the same is here. To that it adds co-op play and a first-person view. Its own ground is strong narrative focus.